 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Full compare data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
