 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G76 MP5 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 MP5 @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G76 MP5.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 MP5 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G76 MP5 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 243659 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 8045 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 217 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 1090 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 29 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 MP5 @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
