 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G52 MP6 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Detailed compare data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 MP6 @ 850MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G52 MP6.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 MP6 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G52 MP6 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 246713 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 6903 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 426 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 284 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 6.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 MP6 @ 850MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
