 |
Mali-G57 MC1 2EE at 750 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-06-2023
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Mali-G57 MC1 2EE @ 750MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC1 2EE or Apple A11 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MC1 2EE @ 750MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE @ 750MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 167435 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 5246 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 540 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 426 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 7.2 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC1 2EE @ 750MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
