 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Extreme benchmark examination data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 293982 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 6841 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 459 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
