 |
Mali-G68 MP2 at 950 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP2 or Apple A11 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 398642 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 928 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2876 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 132 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
