 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G57 MC3 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Detailed compare data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G57 MC3.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 3 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 320761 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 7230 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 512 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 398 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
