 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Hardcore benchmark examination data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Geekbench 5, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu 8 | 489653 | 293982 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 19845 | 6841 | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 459 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 4.84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
