 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Mali-G78AE.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
