 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench 5, PCMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or PowerVR BXM-8-256.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 8 | | Shaders | 192 | 256 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu 8 | 947568 | 489653 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 39765 | 19845 | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 642 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
