 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A12X Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 7 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
