 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench 5, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or PowerVR BXM-8-256.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu 8 | 1268278 | 489653 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 33860 | 19845 | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 642 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
