 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022 Detailed compare data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Shaders | 256 | 0 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 296060 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 8159 | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 516 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|