 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Ultimate benchmark testing data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Mali-G57 MC2.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 2 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 308465 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 368 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 6.1 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC2 @ 950MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
