 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Mali-G57 MP4.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 346612 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 8203 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 386 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
