 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Detailed comparison data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A12 Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
