 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Hardcore benchmark examination data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
