 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 8 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
