 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PCMark, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G77 MC9.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 9 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu 8 | 947568 | 537882 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 39765 | 12878 | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
