 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple M1 at 3200 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple M1 @ 3200MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple M1.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple M1 @ 3200MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple M1 @ 3200MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 3200 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 8 | | Shaders | 192 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 1189065 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 2600 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 1200 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 32 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 @ 3200MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
