 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full comparison data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
