 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G78AE.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 24 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
