 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Extreme benchmark examination data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench 5, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 7 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu 8 | 947568 | 653237 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 39765 | 18183 | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
