 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Detailed comparison data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G710 MP16.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 16 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 738743 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 2648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 92 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
