 |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A15 Bionic GPU or Samsung Xclipse 920.
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 3232 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 192 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 841256 | 947568 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 39765 | | | | | GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1233 MT/s | 1800 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 39.23 GP/s | 64 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
