 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Detailed comparison data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Samsung Xclipse 920.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 192 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 947568 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 39765 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 1800 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 64 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
