 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GFXBench, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G68 MP6.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 24 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 589642 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 2120 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 96 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
