 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Comprehensive compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Samsung Xclipse 920.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 192 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 947568 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 39765 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 1800 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 64 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
