 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Detailed comparison data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G78 MP14.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 24 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 679373 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 16621 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 976 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 2146 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 72 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
