 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Adreno 642L at 550 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Ultimate benchmark testing data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Geekbench 5, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Adreno 642L.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 550 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 0 | | Shaders | 192 | 512 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu 8 | 947568 | 507648 | | GeekBench 5.2 | 39765 | 16978 | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 391 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 10.63 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
