 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G76 MP18.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 18 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 351261 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 9741 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 581.14 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 1357 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 38.97 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 MP18 @ 950MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
