|
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021 Detailed compare data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Mali-G77 MC9.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
Frequency | 900 MHz | 800 MHz | Cores | 4 | 9 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 296060 | 537882 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8159 | 12878 | | | | GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 516 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 5.45 GP/s | 46 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|