 |
Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A12 Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 432586 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 526 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
