 |
Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A12Z Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 715112 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 27526 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 704 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 18 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
