 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
