|
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021 Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Mali-G77 MC9.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | Cores | 4 | 9 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Antutu v10 | 293982 | 537882 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6841 | 12878 | | | | GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 459 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 4.84 GP/s | 46 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|