 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G615 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Detailed comparison data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G615 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G615.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G615 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 608459 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 22456 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 2408 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
