 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
