 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A15 Bionic GPU.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3232 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 841256 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 1233 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 39.23 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
