 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
