 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 7 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
