 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Full comparison data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A12Z Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 715112 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 27526 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 1486 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 704 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 18 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
