 |
Apple A17 Bionic at 3640 MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-03-2023
Detailed compare data of Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A17 Bionic or Mali-G715 MP9.
Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz vs Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz |
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
| Frequency | 3640 MHz | 750 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1314628 | 797642 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 22356 | | | | | GFloPS | 3425 GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1420 MT/s | 3055 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 46 GP/s | 106.15 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A17 Bionic @ 3640MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
