 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU at 3232 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A15 Bionic GPU.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3232 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 841256 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 2989.13 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 1233 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 39.23 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A15 Bionic GPU @ 3232MHz is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
