 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Detailed compare data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A12 Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 432586 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 586 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 526 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A12 Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
