 |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) or IMG8322.
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 21591 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 972 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 164 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.3 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
