 |
Mali-T760 MP4 at 600 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 16-01-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-T760 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-T760 MP4 or IMG8322.
Mali-T760 MP4 @ 600MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T760 MP4 @ 600MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 48369 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 81.6 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 326 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 2.4 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T760 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
