 |
Mali-T860 MP3 at 700 MHz vs IMG8322 at 510 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 15-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-T860 MP3 or IMG8322.
Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz vs IMG8322 @ 510MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz |
IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 510 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 128 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 62586 | 36815 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 2268 | | | | | GFloPS | 71.4 GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 306 MT/s | 287 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 1.9 GP/s | 4.08 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP3 @ 700MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
