 |
Adreno 200 at 133 MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) at 500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021
Detailed compare data of Adreno 200 @ 133MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Adreno 200 or Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail).
Adreno 200 @ 133MHz vs Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 200 @ 133MHz |
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz |
| Frequency | 133 MHz | 500 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 8 | 0 | | Lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm | | Antutu v10 | 16285 | 21591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 305 | 972 | | | | | GFloPS | 2.1 GFloPS | 42.8 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 22 MT/s | 164 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 0.133 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 200 @ 133MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) @ 500MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
