 |
IMG8322 at 510 MHz vs Mali-T860 MP2 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 13-01-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T860 MP2 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy IMG8322 or Mali-T860 MP2.
IMG8322 @ 510MHz vs Mali-T860 MP2 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | IMG8322 @ 510MHz |
Mali-T860 MP2 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 510 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 128 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | | Antutu v10 | 36815 | 55090 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 2268 | 2816 | | | | | GFloPS | 146.2 GFloPS | 47.52 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 287 MT/s | 169 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.08 GP/s | 1.3 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which IMG8322 @ 510MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-T860 MP2 @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
